Is the statement "Otis' inquiry about work initiation times is a good example of behavioral measurement" accurate?

The statement evaluates whether Otis' inquiry about work initiation times qualifies as a good example of behavioral measurement. The reason for identifying "depends on the context" as the accurate choice stems from the fact that behavioral measurement must meet certain criteria to be considered valid.

If Otis is simply asking about general work initiation times without specific parameters or measurable behaviors in mind, then it may not be a good example of behavioral measurement. For measurement to be effective, it should involve clearly defined observable behaviors that can be quantified, such as exact times at which an individual starts a specific task or the frequency with which they initiate work within a defined period.

On the other hand, if Otis' inquiry is framed in a way that provides specific, consistent metrics about work initiation conducted under controlled conditions, then it could potentially serve as a valid form of behavioral measurement. The context of the inquiry—such as the framework in which the work initiation is analyzed and how that data might be utilized—heavily influences whether it aligns with sound behavioral measurement protocols or practices. Thus, the context in which the question is posed is crucial to evaluating the appropriateness of the statement.