RBTs serving on person-centered planning teams may encounter which type of ethical dilemmas?

When considering the ethical dilemmas that Registered Behavior Technicians (RBTs) may face while serving on person-centered planning teams, it's essential to recognize that their roles can intersect with various complexities. The correct choice indicates that RBTs may encounter both client-related dilemmas and issues related to team dynamics and administrative challenges.

Client-related dilemmas often arise when there is a conflict between the preferences and needs of the client and the recommendations made by the team. For instance, an RBT may find themselves advocating for a specific behavioral intervention that aligns with the client's best interests but may not be favored by other team members. This creates a critical situation where the RBT must navigate their ethical obligation to advocate for the client's needs.

In addition, team dynamics conflicts can surface in scenarios where team members have differing views on how to approach the client's care. These conflicts can impact the collaborative efforts necessary for effective person-centered planning and may affect morale and communication within the team. Administratively, challenges may include navigating policies or procedures that do not align well with the therapeutic goals identified for the client, further complicating the ethical landscape.

The recognition that RBTs can face dilemmas related to both the client and the broader team dynamic underscores the complexity of their role, illustrating